贺棣秋

Three Topics:
About Daily Language: Daily language generally conducts as a practical communication implement, which has become a common view. It distinguishes from art language, a media of practicality spurned and only used for appreciation of beauty.However, during a certain period or several periods, art language is in fashion via a way or several ways, which comprises of self routine of art language, and this is also the reason for self inner innovation required of art language.
About Traditional Sculpture: Since Duchamp or understanding the art in modern society with Hegel's words, making daily language into routine art only via changing language environment apparently differentiates from abiding by routine of art language itself or changing daily art of art language itself. This sculpture of abiding by the routine of art language itself or attempting to get rid of routine so as to create new modes and make it reenter routine is called traditional sculpture
About Shape of Sculpture: Traditional sculpture is shown by means of shape, namely, the whole sculpture is composed of three-dimensional, spatial and visual and tactile shape. Even if tinct is added, that's not tinct, but variegation. Color, which doesn't reply on anything except shape, is the attachment of shape. In sculpture, shape and shape are composed of sculpture mode and uniqueness of sculpture mode. Therefore, "shape" in sculpture is radical. Due to usage of habit, without doubt it's dangerous to replace "mode" with "shape" to some degree. Analogously, due to usage of habit, as for sculpture, "shape" is more accurate and unique than "mode".
三个话题:
关于日常语言日常语言一般是作为实用交流的工具,这已经成为一种共识,它区别于艺术语言这种摒弃实用的仅仅作为审美的一种媒介;但是艺术语言在某一阶段或几个阶段都流行某一种或几种样式,这些样式构成了艺术语言自身的日常,这也是艺术语言自身内部要求求新的原因。
关于传统雕塑自杜尚以来或者说用黑格尔对现代社会中的艺术加以理解的话,日常语言通过仅仅改变语境使之成为艺术,这显然有别于遵循艺术语言自身的日常并使之进入日常语言或改变艺术语言自身的日常的艺术,这种遵循艺术语言自身的日常或试图摆脱某些日常进而创造出某些新的样式并使之重新进入日常的雕塑,我称之为传统雕塑。
关于雕塑的形传统雕塑以形来展现一切,即整个雕塑由三维的、可占有空间的、可视可触的形来组成的,即使上彩,也并不是色彩,而是彩色,颜色只是形的附属品,它不靠除形之外的东西说话,雕塑中的形与形构成了雕塑的样式,构成了雕塑样式的独特性,因此雕塑中的“形”是最基本的。由于使用的习惯,用“形”来代替“形式”无疑具有某种危险性,同样由于使用的习惯,“形”对雕塑来说比“形式”则更具有准确性和独特性。
艺术家试图从传统的惯性里挣脱出来,而理论家则力图从纷繁的表象中理出历史渐进的文化脉络。尽管不少人相信历史的偶然性,但事实告诉我们,既使是某个断裂的历史,也有它的社会学方面的理由。……