叶福才等
【摘要】 目的:探讨地佐辛复合罗哌卡因用于硬膜外腔术后镇痛的效果和安全性。方法:选择300例ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ级患者患者随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组150例。分别予以地佐辛+罗哌卡因(观察组),芬太尼+罗哌卡因(对照组)进行硬膜外镇痛。观察比较两组患者术后4、8、12、24、48 h时视觉模拟法(VAS)评分、镇静评分Ramsay及不良反应的情况。结果:观察组术后不同时间VAS评分略低于对照组,但两组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组术后4 h、8 h时Ramsay评分均明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者不良反应比较,对照组恶心呕吐、皮肤瘙痒、头昏等不良反应发生率明显高于观察组(P<0.05)。观察组的镇痛满意度明显高于对照组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:地佐辛复合罗哌卡因用于硬膜外腔术后镇痛疗效确切,不良反应发生率低,安全性高。
【关键词】 地佐辛; 芬太尼; 罗哌卡因; 硬膜外镇痛
Application of Ropivacaine Combined with Dezocine in Postoperative Epidural Analgesia/YE Fu-cai, ZHAO Yan-ping, LIU Zhen-hua, et al.//Medical Innovation of China,2014,11(16):038-040
【Abstract】 Objective: To observe the effect and adverse reactions of ropivacaine combined with dezocine in postoperative epidural analgesia. Method: 300 patients with operation were randomly divided into two groups, observation group: dezocine+ropivacaine, control group: fentanyl+ropivacaine. The visual analogue scale(VAS), Ramsay score and the incidence of adverse reaction in the two group were observed after 48 hours each time. Result: VAS score at 4,8,12,24,48 h after operative between the two group were not statistically significant(P>0.05). Ramsay score at 4,8 h after operative in observation group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions of the control group was higher than that of observation group(P<0.05). Patients satisfactory degree of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion: Ropivacaine combined with dezocine in postoperative epidural analgesia can take a satisfactory effect, fewer side effects and satisfactory curative effect.
【Key words】 Dezocine; Fentanyl; Ropivacaine; Postoperative epidural analgesia
First-authors address: Shijie Hospital, Dongguan 523290, China
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2014.16.012
芬太尼与罗哌卡是硬膜外腔术后镇痛治疗中常用的药物,增加芬太尼剂量能有效控制剧烈疼痛,但大剂量芬太尼常可发生引起恶心、呕吐、皮肤瘙痒、胸壁僵硬、呼吸抑制等不良反应,甚至可能危及患者生命[1-3]。地佐辛是一种新型的阿片受体混合激动一拮抗剂,具有镇痛效果较强、抑制呼吸作用小及不良反应少的优势,已逐渐开始应用于缓解术后和癌症等引起的中重度疼痛[4-7]。本研究采用地佐辛与罗哌卡因复合应用于硬膜外腔术后镇痛,并与芬太尼与罗哌卡复合应用进行对比,探讨其镇痛效果和不良反应,报告如下。
1 资料与方法
1.4 统计学处理
2 结果
观察组术后不同时间VAS评分略低于对照组,但两组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组术后4 h、8 h时Ramsay评分均明显高于对照组,术后24 h、48 h时两组Ramsay评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),见表1。两组患者不良反应比较,对照组恶心呕吐、皮肤瘙痒、头昏等不良反应发生率明显高于观察组;两……