刘松博+戴玲玲+王亚楠
摘要:在员工创造性领域中引入“松—紧”式双元领导概念,对现有研究进行梳理并构建了假设模型,结合非同源问卷在两家中小型高科技企业中的80个R&D团队(其中有效数据来自70个团队)中展开实证研究,通过同层和跨层分析得到以下结论:“松—紧”式领导能够对团队学习起到显著的积极作用,并以此为中介正向影响员工创造性;进一步地,在团队学习正向影响员工创造性的过程中,员工权力距离导向起着显著的调节作用。
关键词:“松—紧”式领导;团队学习;员工创造性;权力距离
中图分类号:C933;F272.92
文献标识码:A文章编号:1001-8409(2014)11-0072-04
A Multilevel Model of Loosetight Leadership and Creativity
LIU Songbo1, DAI Lingling2, WANG Yanan1
(1.School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
2.Beijing Capital International Airport, Beijing 100621)
Abstract:
This paper examined the proposed hypothesis using data collected from 80 R&D teams(the effective data from sevemty teams) in 2 hightech companies. Results indicate that loosetight leadership, a combination of directiveness and participative decisionmaking within team, exhibited a significant positive impact on team learning, which accordingly accelerate creativity. Moreover, taking cultural factors into consideration, when employees orientation of power distance within team is low, relationships between team learning and creativity will become stronger.
Key words: loosetight leadership; team learning; creativity; power distance
在愈发严酷的商业竞争背景下,创新成为各类组织的必然选择。而追根溯源,研究组织创新可从其内部团队及团队的个体成员入手。团队是推动组织创新的最佳单位[1];相应地,个体成员的创造性则可视作支撑组织创新的重要基石。领导被认为承担着支持并推动创新的主要职责,但是目前尚没有研究涉足新兴的“松—紧”式(Loose-tight)双元领导对于员工创造性的影响这一课题。
1文献回顾与研究假设
1.1“松—紧”式领导
Sagie提出并发展了“松—紧”式领导,就是将看似相反的领导指挥(紧)与员工参与(松)合二为一的领导模式[2]。虽然指挥型领导和参与型领导都是传统领导学理论关注的对象,但是把二者结合起来却是领导学领域突破单一领导行为的巨大飞跃[2]。刘松博等对“松—紧”式领导在西方的发展进行了系统回顾,并比较了其和领导情境理论的区别[3]。……