赵志荣
摘 要:从学科门类的视角,对我国高校体育专业的发展进行了审视,认为我国高校对体育学科的定位和管理过于模糊和笼统;专业地位的提升受高层次人才匮乏的制约;专业设置针对性不强,学生社会适应性差;体育专业人文环境差,教风和学风不佳等,这些问题反映出体育学科升格为独立的学科门类时机尚未成熟,在体育专业建设等方面还有许多工作要做。
关 键 词:学校体育;学科门类;体育专业;学科建设;中国高校
中图分类号:G80 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1006-7116(2014)06-0092-04
Dilemmas of and outlets for physical education major in universities in China
from the perspective of disciplinary category
ZHAO Zhi-rong
(School of Physical Education,Luoyang Normal University,Luoyang 471022,China)
Abstract: From the perspective of disciplinary category, the author examined the development of physical education major in universities in China, and put forward the following opinions: the orientation and management developed by universities in China towards physical education major was too vague and general; major status uplifting was restricted by the lack of high-caliber talents; major setup was not highly action-specific; students social adaptation ability was poor; physical education major had an unfavorable humanistic environment, and a not so good teaching and learning atmosphere, etc; these problems reflected that it is not the right time for physical education discipline to be upgraded to an independent disciplinary category, and that there are a lot of work to do in terms of physical education major construction.
Key words: school physical education;disciplinary category;physical education major;disciplinary construction;Chinas colleges and university
学科门类是对具有一定关联学科的归类,是授予学位的学科类别。学科门类由国务院学位委员会和教育部共同制定,是我国进行学位授权审核与学科管理、学位授予单位开展学位授予与人才培养工作的基本依据[1]。因此,体育学是否升格为独立的学科门类对我国高校体育专业设置、学位授予、人才培养有着重要的影响。2011年3月体育学和艺术学同时申报新的学科门类,艺术学升格成功而体育学铩羽而归。对这一事件体育界有着两种截然不同的看法,不少学者痛心疾首、愤愤不平,认为体育学发展日趋完善,成为独立学科门类的时机业已成熟,如果仍然定位于教育学学科门类内会继续混淆两者的关系,制约体育学科的发展;另有一些学者认为体育学自身尚有许多问题亟待解决,体育学科的发展与其是否为独立的学科门类并无直接关系。诚然,我国体育学科发展非常迅速,也取得了不小的成绩,但仅仅依靠本专业学者自夸不行,需得到社会的广泛认可。……