王雪峰 李艳敏 谢新静 赵旭伟 张丽艳 高雪

[摘要] 目的 对改良封闭式负压引流技术在骨外科创伤治疗中的应用进行探讨。方法 整群选取2012年6月—2013年6月于该院进行治疗的104例骨外科创伤患者,将其随机分为对照组51例与观察组53例。对照组使用常规封闭式负压引流技术治疗方法,观察组给予经改良后的封闭式负压引流技术治疗,即在常规VSD敷料中加入1根冲洗管,进行持续灌注冲洗。观察并评价两组的疗效、敷料更换次数、平均每次敷料的有效时间和患者医疗的费用。结果 观察组总有效率为96.2%,明显高于对照组总有效率的85.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组在更换敷料次数、敷料平均维持时间以及治疗费用上均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 改良封闭式负压引流技术在骨外科创伤治疗中的临床效果明显好于用常规治疗方法,临床医生治疗骨外科创伤治疗可以优先考虑该方法。
[关键词] 改良;封闭式;负压引流技术;骨外科;创伤;治疗
[中图分类号] R68 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)05(a)-0050-02
The Application of Vacuum Sealing Drainage in the Treatment of Orthopaedic Trauma
WANG Xue-feng,LI Yan-min,XIE Xin-jing,ZHAO Xu-wei,ZHANG Li-yan,GAO Xue
Bone Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of QiQihar Medical University,Qiqihar,Heilongjiang Province,161041 China
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the application of vacuum sealing drainage in treating orthopaedictrauma. Methods Selecting 104 in-patients with orthopaedictrauma treated in our hospital from June, 2012 to June, 2013. Randomly dividing into control group with 51 treated by traditional vacuum sealing drainage and observation group with 53 treated by andvancedvacuum sealing drainage.and the total efficiency, change times of dressing, average maintenance time of dressing and cost of treatment were observed and compared. Results The total efficiency of the observation group is 96.2%, which is higher than 85.3% of the control group(P<0.05);average maintenance time of dressing in treatment group was higher than that in control group;change times of dressing, and treatment costs in treatment group were significantly lower than that in control group, the difference was significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Advancedvacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of orthopedics trauma has effective clinical curative, has no postoperative complications, treatment time is short and the cost is low, which should be widely applied in clinic.
[Key words] Vacuum sealing drainage; Bone surgical trauma; Clinical curative
近年来,骨外科创伤的发病率逐年上升,导致肌肉、血管、神经和肌腱等软组织损伤,甚至严重感染,该病具有发病绵长反复的特点,严重影响了患者身心健康和生活质量,更甚者可能会继发感染而危及患者生命[1]。传统的封闭式负压引流技术具有很多缺点,如泡沫敷料每次使用周期短,易发生引流管堵塞等[2]。整群选取2012年6月—2013年6月于该院进行治疗的104例骨外科创伤患者,其中接受53例患者改良封闭式负压引流技术的治疗明显优于传统的技术。现报道如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
整群选取于该院进行治疗的104例各种骨科创面就诊患者,将其随机分为对照组与观察组。对照组51例,男26例,女25例,年龄20~59岁,平均年龄(33.4±4.8)岁。受伤原因:车祸16例,机器压伤14例,运动扭伤10例,重物砸伤6例,锐器伤患者3例,其他原因患者2例;……