母婴同室新生儿护理的共同参与式探讨

刘瑞香+郝建花

[摘要] 目的 分析在母婴同室新生儿的临床护理工作中，共同参与式护理的临床效果。方法 方便择取该院2015年4月—2016年4月期间收治的102例新生儿进行研究，将其随机均分为传统组与共同组，传统组新生儿接受常规护理，共同组新生儿则接受共同参与性质的母婴同室护理，对两组新生儿护理的不良反应进行对比分析，同时对比两组新生儿母亲对于护理工作的满意度及新生儿其它主要指标。结果 共同组新生儿的不良反应率仅为3.8%，产妇对于护理工作的满意度为98.1%，明显高于传统组，且相关指标优于传统组对象，两组实验对象的数据对比差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 对于接受母婴同室的新生儿护理而言，共同参与式护理的效果较好，值得推广。

[关键词] 母婴同室；新生儿；护理；共同参与；不良反应

[中图分类号] R72 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2017）02（b）-0152-03

[Abstract] Objective To analyze the clinical effect of？joint participation type of newborns nursing of direct rooming-in in the clinical nursing work. Methods 102 cases of newborns admitted and treated in our hospital from April 2015 to April 2016 were convenient selected for research and randomly divided into two groups， the traditional group adopted the routine nursing， while the joint participation group adopted the direct rooming-in nursing， and the adverse reactions of nursing of the two groups were compared and analyzed， and the satisfactory degree of the mothers in the two groups to the nursing work and other main indicators of newborns were compared at the same time. Results The adverse reaction rate and satisfactory degree of delivery women to the nursing work in the joint participation group were respectively 3.8% and 98.1%， which were obviously higher than those in the traditional group， and the related indicators were better than those in the traditional group， and the difference between groups had statistical significance（P<0.05）. Conclusion The effect of the joint participation nursing for newborns with direct rooming-in is better， which is worth promotion.

[Key words] Direct rooming-in； Newborn； Nursing； Joint participation； Adverse reaction

新生兒是临床中存在的特殊群体，由于新生儿的各项身体系统及各个器官的发育还尚未完善，因此，细微的护理差错就很容易导致新生儿护理出现严重问题[1]。目前，伴随护理理念的发展及临床护理工作的不断发展，在新生儿护理中，母婴同室护理应用广泛，主要就是将新生儿与产妇集中在同一个房间，共同进行护理[2]。很多产妇在生产时过度紧张，对于个人身份的转换尚未做好准备，因此，对于新生儿护理也会产生紧张等情绪，容易影响护理质量[3-4]。该院在母婴同室护理的新生儿中应用共同参与模式，方便选择2015年4月—2016年4月期间在该院出生的102例新生儿作为实验对象，现报道如下。……