曹庆科+丁韧烨+李胜华+朱宇翔+谭宇飞+殷文浩


[摘要] 目的 比较带状疱疹患者治疗前后血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平的变化,分析其临床意义。 方法 分别对100例带状疱疹患者(观察组)治疗前后和100例健康体检者(对照组)的血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平进行测定,并进行统计学分析。 结果 观察组治疗前NSE水平明显高于对照组[(190.13±6.21)vs(70.95±4.27)pg/mL,P<0.01]。观察组治疗前血清NSE水平明显高于治疗后[(190.13±6.21)vs(121.12±5.31)pg/mL],差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.01)。观察组中NSE水平在不同皮损部位、范围及疼痛程度间存在差异(P<0.05);而在不同性别、年龄间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。 结论 带状疱疹患者急性期NSE水平升高且与皮损范围、发病部位、疼痛程度相关,与性别、年龄无关。
[关键词] 带状疱疹;神经元特异性烯醇化酶;水痘-带状疱疹病毒;神经痛
[中图分类号] R512.3 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-9701(2017)08-0005-03
[Abstract] Objective To compare the changes of serum neuron-specific enolase(NSE) levels in patients with herpes zoster before and after treatment, and to analyze its clinical significance. Methods The levels of serum neuron-specific enolase(NSE) in 100 patients with herpes zoster (observation group) before and after treatment and 100 healthy subjects (control group) were measured and analyzed statistically. Results The level of NSE in the observation group was (190.13±6.21)pg/mL, significantly higher than(70.95±4.27) pg/mL in the control group, P<0.01. The level of serum NSE in the observation group before treatment was significantly higher than that after treatment(190.13±6.21) vs (121.12±5.31) pg/mL), and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01). There was significant difference in the level of NSE between the different lesion parts, range and the extent of pain in the observation group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the level of NSE among the different sex and ages(P>0.05). Conclusion The level of NSE is increased in the acute stage of herpes zoster, and related to the extent of the lesion, the location of the lesion and the degree of pain, regardless of gender and age.
[Key words] Herpes zoster; Neuron-specific enolase; Varicella zoster virus; Neuralgia
神經元特异性烯醇化酶(neuron-specific enolase,NSE)是一种存在于神经元内的与糖氧化和糖酵解有关的蛋白酶,当神经元受损时,可导致体内NSE水平升高。目前有研究发现小细胞肺癌患者血清NSE增高显著[1],另外NSE与神经损伤疾病也有关[2,3]。带状疱疹(Herpes zoster,HZ)是一种临床多发的病毒性皮肤病,由水痘-带状疱疹病毒(Varicella zoster virus,VZV)感染引起,以皮肤疱疹和神经损害为特征。带状疱疹患者有无NSE水平的变化,目前还缺少文献报道。
1 对象与方法
1.1 研究对象
随机选择2013年1月~2015年1月在我院皮肤科门诊初次就诊且病程在1周内的带状疱疹患者(观察组) 100例,其中男57例、女43例,年龄18~65(33±10)岁。根据文献[4]符合带状疱疹诊断。选择同期在我院健康体检的正常的成年人100例作为对照组,其中男52例、女48例,年龄18~68(32±11)岁。排除标准:患有小细胞肺癌、其他中枢及周围神经疾病、严重肝肾功能不全、妊娠及哺乳期妇女。两组研究对象的年龄、性别比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。……