刘娟 赵成香
[摘要] 目的 探究分析糖尿病肾病老年患者精神状态及其护理方法与效果。 方法 以2015年6月—2017年6月老年糖尿病肾病患者25例作为观察组,同期选择与其资料相当25例糖尿病肾病患者为对照组,分别采用优质护理和常规护理进行对比,分析两组患者的临床护理效果。 结果 观察组患者糖尿病肾病患者SAS评分(35.1±5.3)分明显低于对照组(39.4±4.6)分,且观察组护理满意度(96.0%)远远高于对照组(72.0%),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 优质护理干预可以改善老年糖尿病肾病患者的心理状态,有助于提高护理满意度,值得临床推广应用。
[关键词] 糖尿病肾病;精神状态;护理方法
[中图分类号] R473 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1672-4062(2018)03(b)-0157-02
Effect of Diabetic Nephropathy on the Life and Mental Health of Senile People and Nursing Intervention Measures
LIU Juan, ZHAO Cheng-xiang
Yinlang Street Community Health Service Center, Daqing, Heilongjiang Province, 163412 China
[Abstract] Objective To study and analyze the nursing method and effect of diabetic nephropathy on the life and mental health of senile people and nursing intervention measures. Methods from June 2015 to June 2017 25 cases of senile patients with diabetic nephropathy were selected as the observation group, and 25 cases at the same period were selected as the control group, respectively used the excellent nursing and routine nursing, and the clinical nursing effect of the two groups was analyzed. Results The SAS score in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group [(35.1±5.3) marks vs (39.4±4.6) marks], and the nursing satisfactory degree of patients in the observation group was much higher than that in the control group (96.0% vs 72.0%), and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The excellent nursing intervention can improve the mental state of patients with diabetic nephropathy, which contributes to improving the nursing satisfactory degree, and it is worth clinical promotion and application.
[Key words] Diabetic nephropathy; Mental state; Nursing method
糖尿病腎病是一种由糖尿病代谢紊乱所导致的肾脏疾病,也是常见的糖尿病慢性并发症之一[1]。如果得不到有效治疗,病情长期发展下去可引发终末期肾脏病,从而给患者的身体健康造成严重的不良影响。而老年糖尿病肾病患者多合并高血压、冠心病等,治疗疗程较长,部分患者存在一定的焦虑情绪,因此,临床治疗中需要加强护理干预,该组研究选取2015年6月—2017年6月对糖尿病肾病老年患者25例实施优质护理,现报道如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
该研究中所选50例糖尿病肾病患者均经临床诊断确诊到院就诊,按照随机数表法平均分为2组,每组各25例,对照组中男性患者13例,女性患者12例,年龄在59~85岁之间,平均年龄为(69.4±3.4)岁,病程在1~18年之间,平均病程为(5.2±1.3)年,观察组中男性患者14例,女性患者11例,年龄60~85岁,平均年龄(70.2±3.6)岁,病程在1.5~19年之间,平均病程为(5.1±1.5)年。两组患者一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),所选患者均对该研究知情并自愿参与。……