周海广
【摘 要】目的:对急性脊柱创伤采用切开减压椎弓根内固定治疗的临床效果进行分析。方法:选择2018年3月-2019年2月来院医治的54例急性脊柱创伤患者,用掷硬币法均分为参照组和观察组,各27例。参照组用传统开放手术治疗,观察组用切开减压椎弓根内固定治疗,比较两组的治疗效果。结果:治疗后,观察组的治疗效果优于参照组,(P<0.05)统计学意义明显。结论:切开减压椎弓根内固定治疗对急性脊柱创伤更有效,骨折处功能性更佳,适合推广。
【关键词】急性脊柱创伤;切开减压椎弓根内固定治疗;脊髓损伤
【中图分类号】R681 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1672-3783(2020)06-0042-01
[Abstract] Objective To analyze the clinical effect of open decompression and pedicle internal fixation in the treatment of acute spinal trauma. Methods from March 2018 to February 2019, 54 patients with acute spinal trauma were divided into two groups: the reference group and the observation group. The control group was treated with traditional open surgery, and the observation group was treated with open decompression and pedicle internal fixation. Results after treatment, the therapeutic effect of the observation group was better than that of the reference group (P < 0.05). Conclusion open decompression and pedicle internal fixation is more effective in the treatment of acute spinal trauma, and the function of fracture is better, which is suitable for promotion.
[Keywords] acute spinal trauma; open decompression and pedicle screw fixation; spinal cord injury
交通事故等是造成急性脊柱创伤的诱因,威胁患者生命,增肌脊髓损伤概率。传统开放手术治疗和切开减压椎弓根内固定治疗效果都很好,但切开减压椎弓根内固定治疗有效性更高,减少手术治疗盲目性,利用科学方式选择置钉点,借助C臂X线引导操作完成,让骨折处更稳定,保障术后痊愈,详见如下。
1 资料和方法
1.1一般资料
选择2018年3月-2019年2月来院医治的54例急性脊柱创伤患者,用掷硬币法均分为参照组和观察组,各27例。所有患者均有明显外伤、且X线、MRI等检查确诊为急性脊柱创伤。男女比例为44:13,平均年龄为(56.38±11.01)岁,包括19例交通意外伤、25例高空坠落伤、10例重物砸伤。两组基线资料(P>0.05)不展示统计学意义,有比较价值。
1.2方法
所有患者术前均进行X线、CT等检查,根据检查结果制定手术方案。
1.2.1参照组
传统开放手术治疗:患者全麻后,找到手术部位,从椎旁肌逐渐剥离,一直到小关节外侧,将肌肉撑开,在骨折处置入棒骨钉完成复位,术后根据患者情况留置引流管,并在适当的时间内拔除。……p>