局限、架构与实施:综合治理适用于体育公共服务供给的逻辑阐释

2021-02-21 13:45:02曹华,樊炳有
山东体育学院学报 2021年4期

曹华,樊炳有

摘要:我国提出的治理体系和治理能力现代化遵循的是国家治理这一前提,在此基础上运用 “综合治理”这一具有中国实践特色的理论成果,探寻解决中国体育公共服务供给困境的“治理术”。运用文献研究、逻辑分析等方法,阐明体育公共服务综合治理的内涵,提出“一个宗旨,两维目标,三极支撑,四维互动”有机融合的体育公共服务供给的综合治理分析框架;揭示了体育公共服务综合治理主体的多元性与层次性,以及“合作-平衡”的治理结构,混合交叉方式的治理路径,组织化调控的治理工具,整合性的治理方式,能高度协调和统一破解体育公共服务供给不均衡、不充分的现实问题。

关键词:体育公共服务;综合治理;治理转型

中图分类号:G80-051文献标识码:A文章编号:1006-2076(2021)04-0019-07

Logic exploration of comprehensive governance to sports public service supply governance

CAO Hua1, FAN Bingyou2

1.Dept. of Police Tactics and Command, Guangdong Police College, Guangzhou 510440,Guangdong, China;2.School of Physical Education, Suzhou University, Suzhou 215021,Jiangsu,China

Abstract:The modernization of governance system and governance capacity proposed by China follows the premise of national governance, and on this basis, the "comprehensive governance", which is a theoretical achievement with Chinese practical characteristics, is used to explore the "governance technique" to solve the dilemma of China’s sports public service supply. By means of literature research and logical analysis, this paper clarifies the connotation of comprehensive governance of sports public service, and puts forward a comprehensive governance and analysis framework of the organic integration of "one purpose, two dimensional goals, three pole support and four dimensional interaction". Also, it reveals the diversity of sports public service comprehensive governance body and hierarchy, the "cooperation-balance" governance structure, the hybrid governance path, the cross way of organizational control governance tools, and integrated governance, which can efficiently solve the imbalance and inadequate problems in sports public services supply.

Key words:sports public service; comprehensive governance; governance transformation

在全面深化改革中,公共權力的合法行使、公共资源的合理利用、公共产品的有效提供、公共环境的有效保护都以“公共”为核心[1]。国家治理的实现是通过国家与社会的合作、政府与非政府组织的合作、公共部门与私人部门的合作、强制力与主动性的合作、正式制度与非正式机制的合作途径来实现的[2]。这里所强调的“合作”无疑是基于平等、自愿、信任等基础上的互利行为,但是更重要的是“合作”是一种不同于“分工-协作”的、更积极的、更灵活的互动行为,更适合随着社会体制改革逐步深入衍生出来的日益复杂的社会公共服务。在体育公共服务治理的研究中,我国……

登录APP查看全文