嵇绍娟
【摘要】目的:研究临床护理路径应用到重症监护病房(ICU)重症颅脑损伤患者中的护理作用与效果。方法:摘选2018年3月至2020年8月期间我院接收的106例ICU重症颅脑损伤患者,参考随机性分组法,均分对照组(n=53)、观察组(n=53),对照组行常规性护理,而观察组行临床护理路径,对其最终结果观察并比较。结果:观察组住院时间、住院花费与对照组相比明显更低(P<0.05);观察组并发症的总发生率与对照组相比明显更低(P<0.05);观察组抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分与对照组相比明显更低(P<0.05)。结论:临床护理路径应用到ICU重癥颅脑损伤患者中,能够得到更为满意的效果。
【关键词】ICU;护理;重症颅脑损伤;效果;临床护理路径
[中图分类号]R473.6 [文献标识码]A [文章编号]2096-5249(2021)05-0095-02
Application of clinical nursing pathway in ICU patients with severe craniocerebral injury
JI Shao-juan (ICU of Kunshan zongrenqing Memorial Hospital, Suzhou Jiangsu 215300, China)
[Abstract] Objective: To study the effect of clinical nursing pathway on patients with severe craniocerebral injury in intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: 106 cases of ICU patients with severe craniocerebral injury from March 2018 to August 2020 were selected and randomly divided into control group (n=53) and observation group (n=53). The control group was given routine nursing, while the observation group was given clinical nursing pathway. The final results were observed and compared. Results: compared with the control group, the hospitalization time and cost of the observation group were significantly lower (P<0.05); the total incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower (P<0.05); the scores of self rating Depression Scale (SDS) and self rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) in the observation group were significantly lower (P<0.05). Conclusion: clinical nursing pathway applied to ICU patients with severe craniocerebral injury can get more satisfactory results.
[Key words] ICU; nursing; severe craniocerebral injury; effect; clinical nursing path
在临床中,对于重症颅脑损伤而言,其大多都是因为各类暴力作用至头颅所引发的一种损伤,其是临床中十分普遍的高危疾病;由于这类患者较易出现死亡,所以,就算患者进入至重症监护病房(ICU)中,也极有可能使得病情有所加重,如果在这时没有对患者实施相应的护理,会引发许多并发症,并出现十分严重的后果[1]。所以,临床中更具针对性的救治、干预均是减少重症颅脑损伤患者各类并发症的核心[2]。以往临床中对ICU重症颅脑损伤患者大多应用常规性护理,但是,其最终的效果不够理想[3]。而在将临床护理路径应用到ICU重症颅脑损伤患者后,可以促进患者的病情最大限度地得到改善,以保障其预后[4]。本研究特选取本院106例ICU重症颅脑损伤患者,分别采取两种不同的护理方案,探究临床护理路径对患者住院时间、住院花费、并发症的总发生率、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分的应用价值。……