张良 刘燕萍
[摘要]目的 探讨引导式教育在小儿脑性瘫痪(CP)康复治疗中的应用效果,为临床提供指导。方法 选取2014年1月~2017年1月我院收治的80例小儿CP患儿作为观察对象,随机分为常规组和实验组,每组各40例。常规组应用常规康复治疗,实验组应用常规康复治疗+引导式教育治疗。两组均随访1年,比较两组的粗大运动功能量表(GMFM)评分、日常生活活动能力(ADL)评分、社会适应能力评分及患儿的满意度。结果 实验组治疗后GMFM评分[(95.24±10.78)分]高于常规组[(68.78±12.23)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组治疗后ADL评分[(61.24±12.98)分]、社会适应能力评分[(4.24±1.78)分]高于常规组[(50.95±12.23)、(3.01±1.25)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对小儿CP患儿采取引导式教育十分可行,可显著改善患儿的运动功能。
[关键词]引导式教育;小儿脑性瘫痪;康复;效果
[中图分类号] R742.3 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2018)9(a)-0183-03
[Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of guiding education in rehabilitation treatment of cerebral palsy(CP)in children. Methods 80 cases of infantile CP children in our hospital From January 2014 and January 2017 were selected as research object, which randomly divided into normal group and experimental group, 40 cases in each group. The normal group was given conventional rehabilitation, the experimental group was given conventional rehabilitation treatment+heuristic education. All the patients were followed up for one year, and the gross motor function scale (GMFM) score, daily life activity ability (ADL) score, social adaptability score and satisfaction degree of the children were compared between two groups. Results After treatment, GMFM score (95.24±10.78) was higher in the experimental group than that in the conventional group (68.78±12.23), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Experimental ADL scores after treatment in children with (61.24±12.98), social adaptation ability score (4.24±1.78) points were higher than that in the conventional group ([50.95±12.23], [3.01±1.25]), the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion It is feasible to guide education for children with CP and can improve their motor function.
[Key words] Guided education; Cerebral palsy in children; Rehabilitation; Effect
腦性瘫痪(CP)在临床上简称为脑瘫,主要是指脑发育期由于各种原因导致非进行性脑损伤的一种临床综合征[1],以运动功能障碍为典型症状,调查显示,CP是导致儿童残疾的主要疾病,其中大约有72.3%的患儿需进行康复训练[2-3]。该疾病若不及时干预,不仅给患儿的日常生活带来极大程度的不便,还可在一定程度上影响患儿的身心健康,对患儿家庭及国家亦造成了较严重的经济负担[4-5]。本研究对小儿CP患儿分别实施常规康复治疗、常规康复治疗+引导式教育治疗,以探讨引导式教育的治疗效果,现报道如下。
1资料与方法
1.1一般资料
选取2014年1月~2017年1月我院收治的80例小儿CP患儿作为观察对象,随机分为常规组和实验组,每组各40例。本研究经我院医学伦理委员会批准及患儿家长知情同意后开展研究。实验组年龄3~12岁,平均(5.89±0.73)岁;男29例,女11例;……