贾珍荣
摘 要:学科评估是大学(学科)建设和发展的反馈机制、激励机制、参考机制和导向机制。以三家评估机构为代表,对当前学科评估指标体系的特点和共性问题进行分析,提出了学科效能概念,对学科效能理念指导下的体育学学科评估体系建构进行展望和阐释,提出了体育学学科评估体系指标设置总体原则,体育学学科评估体系构建必须超越传统问责逻辑,体育学学科评估价值取向要从结果评估向效能评估转变等几点设想。
关键词:体育学;学科评估;学科效能;问责逻辑
中图分类号:G807.4 文献标识码:A文章编号:1006-2076(2018)01-0128-06
Abstract:Discipline assessment is the feedback mechanism, incentive mechanism, reference mechanism and guidance mechanism of university (discipline) construction and development. By taking three university rating agencies, this paper put forward the concept of discipline efficiency on the base of analyzing the characteristic and common problem of current discipline assessment index system, and interpreted the construction of P.E. discipline assessment index system under the idea of discipline efficiency, including the construction principle of P.E. discipline assessment index system; construction principle of P.E. discipline assessment index system should transcend the traditional accountability logic; the P.E. discipline assessment value orientation should shift from result assessment to efficiency assessment.
Key words:physical education discipline; discipline assessment; discipline efficiency; accountability logic
大學的学科既是按知识门类划分的学术体系,又是一个组织实体,有自己的机构建制、力量配置、运行机制等,它是高等教育系统中最基本的学术组织,是大学各种功能的具体承担者。因此,所谓的大学排名实质上是学科水平即学科评估结果的排名。学科评估可以测量、考核、评价过去的学科建设和发展的工作绩效、总结经验和教训,为未来的学科建设和发展提供有效的、有针对性的新理念、新思路和新办法。学科评估实质上是大学(学科)建设和发展的反馈机制、激励机制、参考机制和导向机制。因此,学科评估排名对推动高校学科建设,宣传学科发展的成就,提高高校办学质量的社会透明度等,具有现实和长远的意义。
体育学科也不例外,一个科学合理的体育学学科评估体系对推动体育学科的建设和发展意义重大。……