侯贤等



【摘要】目的 探讨血液净化在急性脑出血治疗中的作用及其疗效。方法 比较血液净化组(A组)与常规治疗组(B组)患者3,7,14天的全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)情况以及超敏C-反应蛋白(hs-CRP),白介素-6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)的差异和病死率。采用NIHSS(National Institutes of Health Stroke)和ADL量表评估两组患者在治疗前后的神经功能及生活质量的变化。结果 A组患者经血液净化治疗3,7,14天后SIRS好转率高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),hs-CRP,IL-6和TNF-α水平及病死率均低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组患者在治疗前后的神经功能改善情况较B组更为明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 血液净化可有效清除脑出血患者的炎症因子,改善患者预后恢复,降低死亡率,對急性脑出血的治疗意义重大。
【关键词】脑出血;血液净化;SIRS;炎症因子
【中图分类号】R743.34 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】ISSN.2095-6681.2015.10.0.03
【Abstract】Objective To investigate the role of blood purification in the treatment of acute intracerebral hemorrhage and its curative effect.Methods The mortality,condition of SIRS in 3 d,7 d and 14 d,and differences among hs-CRP,IL-6 and TNF-α levers of the blood purification group(group A)and the common treatment group(group B)were compared respectively.Neural function and changes in life quality before and after therapy were assessed by NIHSS and ADL scale.Results Improvement rate of SIRS in group A was larger than that in group B in 3 d, 7 d and 14 d after blood purification treatment(P<0.05).Mortality and levers of hs-CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α in group A were smaller than those in group B(P<0.05).Improvement of neurological function before and after therapy in group A was more significant than that in group B(P<0.05).Conclusion Blood purification not only enables to effectively clear inflammatory factors in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage,but also by aiding conventional therapy,improves the prognosis of recovery in patients,as well as reduces the mortality,which is of vital importance in the treatment of acute intracerebral hemorrhage.
【Key words】Cerebral hemorrhage; Blood purification; SIRS; Inflammatory factor
急性脑出血(ICH)是中老年人群的常见病,每年全球有超过100万人受累于该病[1]。研究报道,该类患者30天内死亡率高达35%~52%,经治疗能够功能性自立患者仅有12%~39%[2]。研究表明,ICH患者血液中的相关指标都明显高于正常人[3],血液净化是降低血液细胞因子等相关指标的有效手段[4]。本研究通过比较血液净化治疗和常规治疗的ICH患者的疗效及生活质量的变化,初步探讨血液净化在脑出血疾病治疗中的应用价值,以期为脑出血的治疗提供有益的思路和参考。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
选取2010年1月~2012年12我院重症医学科收治的脑出血患者100例作为研究对象。入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分(GCS)在5~12分,住院期间发生SIRS。SIRS诊断标准参考《实用危重症医学》[5]。
根据患者是否进行血液净化分为两组:血液净化组(A组)和常规治疗组(B组),各50例。A组男28例,女22例,年龄47~75岁;B组男31例,女19例,年龄45~74岁。对比两组患者的年龄、性别、入院GCS评分等一般资料,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。见表1。
1.2 方法
所有患者入院后均进行生命体征监测和神经功能评估,并予以脱水降颅压,清除自由基,保护胃黏膜,防治感染,营养支持,维持内环境稳定等综合治疗。……p>